by LS2 » Fri Sep 22, 2023 12:20 pm
Vladimir Putin rose to power by being the hero after the
Russian apartment bombings. But that was caused by the FSB, and Putin was the director of the FSB until short before that event. Clearly he installed himself as president through terrorism, so Russia has a terrorist as the head of state. And since intelligence agencies work together globally, his power isn't something contrary to the wishes of the
deep state; it's all part of a charade and he's playing the role of a boogeyman to the West.
I should clarify on that. What does he do wrong, then? How people perceive someone doesn't necessarily have to do with their actions, they can just be demonized for no reason, as many recent events demonstrate very clearly. (Russel Brand and Julian Assange suffice as examples.) The West is not supposed to consider that NATO expansion has anything to do with Putin's decision to invade Ukraine. We're just supposed to see him as an incarnation of evil.
There's a parallel with Al Qaeda. They were set up to be blamed for 9/11, even though it comes forth from the Mujahedeen who were trained by the CIA. That's the hallmark of a boogeyman: it's a supposed evil which behind the scenes is set up by an intelligence agency.
The problem with Putin's background is that the other side of the story, namely the view of him as some kind of hero, isn't the truth either. When he speaks out against woke culture and the likes, that causes some people in the West, mostly on the right side of the political spectrum, to sympathize. Meanwhile he still gets demonized, so this is just polarizing Western populations. And because he's part of the deep state, he can just tone down his apparent opposition to the deep state. That's what Donald Trump did. That's right: it isn't just an American president who can function as controlled opposition, but a forein one as well. The deep state has influence globally, so they can control all parts of the threatre.
Vladimir Putin rose to power by being the hero after the [url=https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Russian_apartment_bombings]Russian apartment bombings[/url]. But that was caused by the FSB, and Putin was the director of the FSB until short before that event. Clearly he installed himself as president through terrorism, so Russia has a terrorist as the head of state. And since intelligence agencies work together globally, his power isn't something contrary to the wishes of the [url=https://wikispooks.com/wiki/SDS]deep state[/url]; it's all part of a charade and he's playing the role of a boogeyman to the West.
I should clarify on that. What does he do wrong, then? How people perceive someone doesn't necessarily have to do with their actions, they can just be demonized for no reason, as many recent events demonstrate very clearly. (Russel Brand and Julian Assange suffice as examples.) The West is not supposed to consider that NATO expansion has anything to do with Putin's decision to invade Ukraine. We're just supposed to see him as an incarnation of evil.
There's a parallel with Al Qaeda. They were set up to be blamed for 9/11, even though it comes forth from the Mujahedeen who were trained by the CIA. That's the hallmark of a boogeyman: it's a supposed evil which behind the scenes is set up by an intelligence agency.
The problem with Putin's background is that the other side of the story, namely the view of him as some kind of hero, isn't the truth either. When he speaks out against woke culture and the likes, that causes some people in the West, mostly on the right side of the political spectrum, to sympathize. Meanwhile he still gets demonized, so this is just polarizing Western populations. And because he's part of the deep state, he can just tone down his apparent opposition to the deep state. That's what Donald Trump did. That's right: it isn't just an American president who can function as controlled opposition, but a forein one as well. The deep state has influence globally, so they can control all parts of the threatre.